Scholarly record
MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS OF BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGARDING BUILDING MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References30
Mesároš, P, Spišáková, M., Kyjaková L, Mandičák, T. Expanded polystyrene as the bearing building material of low energy construction, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 71, iss. 1, Article number 012002, 2015; International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015
Kozlovská M., Kyjaková, L., Mačková, D. Comparison of low -energy houses selected parameters made by traditional and modern methods of construction , Advanced Material Research, vol. 1041, pp. 51-54, 2014;
Mateus R., Braganca L., Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT –H. Building and Environment, vol. 46, iss. 10, pp. 1962-1971, 2011;
Ding G. K. C., Sustainable construction: the role of the environmental assessment tool. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 451-464, 2008.
Moldovan M. C. , Visa I., Neagoe M., Burduhos B. G. Solar heating&cooling energy mixes to transport low energy buildidngs in nearly zero energy buildings, Energ Proc. vol. 48, pp. 924 -937, 2014;
Burman E., Mumovic D., Kimpian J., Toward measurmenet and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings, Energy. vol. 77, pp. 153-163 , 2014;
Iddon, Ch. R. Firth S. K., Embodied and operational energy for new -build housing: A case study of construction method in the UK , Energy and Buildings, vol. 67, pp. 479-488, 2013;
Hikmat H. A., Saba F. A. N. , Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries. Building and Environment, vol. 44. pp. 1053-1064, 2009;
Cole R. J.. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information, vol. 26, iss. 1 , pp. 3–16, 1998;
Kapalo P., Domnita F., Lojkovics J., Methodology for calculating the fresh air ventilation airflow rate based on CO 2 concentration. Pollack Periodica. vol. 9, no.2, p p. 89-97, 2014;
Kapalo, P., Siroczki, P., Calculating the intensity of ventilation in classrooms on the basis of measured concentrations of carbon dioxide in Slovakia - Case study, International Journal of Ventilation, vol. 13, pp. 247-257, 2014;
Saaty, T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008;
Čuláková M., Vilčeková S. Krídlová Burdová, Katunská J, Reduction of carbon footprint of building structures. Chemical engi neering transactions, vol. 29, pp. 199-204, 2012;
Medineckiene, M., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K. Sustainable construction takin g into account the building impact on the environment.Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 118-127, 2011;
Estokova, A.; Porhincak, M., Environmental analysis of two building material alternatives in struc tures with the aim of sustainable construction. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, vol.17, iss. 1, pp. 75-83, 2015; International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org
Mesároš, P, Spišáková, M., Kyjaková L, Mandičák, T. Expanded polystyrene as the bearing building material of low energy construction, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 71, iss. 1, Article number 012002, 2015; International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015
Kozlovská M., Kyjaková, L., Mačková, D. Comparison of low -energy houses selected parameters made by traditional and modern methods of construction , Advanced Material Research, vol. 1041, pp. 51-54, 2014;
Mateus R., Braganca L., Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBToolPT –H. Building and Environment, vol. 46, iss. 10, pp. 1962-1971, 2011;
Ding G. K. C., Sustainable construction: the role of the environmental assessment tool. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 451-464, 2008.
Moldovan M. C. , Visa I., Neagoe M., Burduhos B. G. Solar heating&cooling energy mixes to transport low energy buildidngs in nearly zero energy buildings, Energ Proc. vol. 48, pp. 924 -937, 2014;
Burman E., Mumovic D., Kimpian J., Toward measurmenet and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings, Energy. vol. 77, pp. 153-163 , 2014;
Iddon, Ch. R. Firth S. K., Embodied and operational energy for new -build housing: A case study of construction method in the UK , Energy and Buildings, vol. 67, pp. 479-488, 2013;
Hikmat H. A., Saba F. A. N. , Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries. Building and Environment, vol. 44. pp. 1053-1064, 2009;
Cole R. J.. Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods. Building Research & Information, vol. 26, iss. 1 , pp. 3–16, 1998;
Kapalo P., Domnita F., Lojkovics J., Methodology for calculating the fresh air ventilation airflow rate based on CO 2 concentration. Pollack Periodica. vol. 9, no.2, p p. 89-97, 2014;
Kapalo, P., Siroczki, P., Calculating the intensity of ventilation in classrooms on the basis of measured concentrations of carbon dioxide in Slovakia - Case study, International Journal of Ventilation, vol. 13, pp. 247-257, 2014;
Saaty, T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 83–98, 2008;
Čuláková M., Vilčeková S. Krídlová Burdová, Katunská J, Reduction of carbon footprint of building structures. Chemical engi neering transactions, vol. 29, pp. 199-204, 2012;
Medineckiene, M., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K. Sustainable construction takin g into account the building impact on the environment.Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 18, iss. 2, pp. 118-127, 2011;
Estokova, A.; Porhincak, M., Environmental analysis of two building material alternatives in struc tures with the aim of sustainable construction. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, vol.17, iss. 1, pp. 75-83, 2015; International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

