Scholarly record
THE FORM-SHAPING PARADIGM OF A SUBJECT-S APPROACH TO CONSTRUCT MEANS OF CREATING ABSTRACTIONS AND ITS FORMALIZED REPRESENTATION
Abstract
In modern studies, the idea is formed that the system approach is a conceptual design, the background in which one of its forms is fixed in the form of a system and its basic abstraction. The existing specific types of systems and their basic abstractions are the result of empirical fixation of ideas about the system approach, fixation of the formed concept of the system approach in the form of one of the types of system forms: "... the representation of an object in the form of a system is nothing more than a transformed form of fixation of the system approach." If you look at the development of scientific research from this point of view, you can observe the process of fixing various ideas about the system approach in the form of corresponding types of specific forms of systems and their basic abstractions. The background for the design of systems is the idea of a systematic approach in the form of substance, chaos, ?nothing?, a medium, implicit knowledge, an intellectual environment, methodological tools in the sense of Kuhn, in which there should be the ability to fix the corresponding types of specific forms of systems and their basic abstractions. An empirical approach has been practically formed for the formation of types of systems, the essence of which is the initial improvement of the provisions or ideas about the system approach as a process of developing the background, context, and then, in the formed new idea of the system approach, the background, the types of specific forms of systems and their basic are empirically fixed abstractions for creating systems of this type. To determine what constitutes a systematic approach, it is necessary to solve the problem of how to move from fixing the idea of a systemic approach in the form of types of forms of systems to the formalized construction of the corresponding types of structures of the systemic approach. The article discusses the proposed concept of designing the structures of the systems approach, considers the basic abstraction used for the design of structures of the systems approach. Examples of strategic and detailed design of the systems approach structures are given. The prospects of using the proposed approach for the design of specific systems are substantiated.
Publication Impact Profile
- Citations
- CrossRef - Citation Indexes: 3
- Scopus - Citation Indexes: 4
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
Publication details
References15
Kuhn, T. S. (2013). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
Lepskii V.E. (2009) Sub"ektno-orientirovannyi podkhod k innovatsionnomu razvitiyu – [Subject-oriented approach to innovation development]M.: Izd-vo «Kogito-TsentR». – 208 p.
George Spencer-Brown (1994). Laws of Form. Portland OR: Cognizer Company, ISBN 0-9639899-0-1
Addo-Tenkorang R. (2011). Concurrent engineering (CE): A review literature report. in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2011 Vol II.
Li, F., Wu, T., & Hu, M. (2014). Design of a decentralized framework for collaborative product design using memetic algorithms. Optimization and Engineering. DOI: 10.1007/s11081-012-9210-6
Colin Ellis (2015) Why half your projects will fail this year/ http://www.cio.com.au/article/582055/ why-half-your-projects-will-fail-year/ – 2015.
Mehra, B., Bishop, A. P., Bazzell, I., and Smith, C. (2002). Scenarios in the Afya Project as a Participatory Action Research (PAR) Tool for Studying Information Seeking and Use Across the "Digital Divide," Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 53(14), 1259-1266.
Zachman, J. A. (1982). Business systems planning and business information control study: a comparison. IBM Systems Journal. DOI: 10.1147/sj.211.0031
Smirnov G.A. (2017) Ot ob”ektnoj k setevoj paradigme sistemnogo podhoda (chast’ vtoraya) [From object to network paradigm of system approach (part two)]. Trudy ISA RAN [Proceedings of ISA RAS]. Vol. 67., No1/2017. pp. 89-103.
Klir, G. J. (1985). Architecture of Systems Problem Solving. In Architecture of Systems Problem Solving. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-1168-4
Shhedrovickij G. P. (1995) Problemy metodologii sistemnogo issledovanija. Izbrannye trudy. [Methodological problems of systems research. Selected works]. Moscow: Shk. Kul’t.Polit, 800 p.
Mikoni SV. (2018) Formalization of the cognitive process using the basis of models [In Russian]. Ontology of designing. 2018; 8(1): 35-48. - DOI: 10.18287/2223-9537-2018-8-1-35-48.
Rogozov Y. Paradigma smyslovogo proektirovaniya sistemnykh ob"ektov [The Paradigm of semantic system objects design] Trudy ISA RAN [Proceedings of ISA RAS]. Vol. 67., No1/2017. pp. 41-53
Parsons, T. (1988). The Structure of Social Action. European Journal of Sociology. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600005646.
Luman N. (2007) Vvedenie v sistemnuju teoriju (Pod redakciej Dirka Vekkera) [Introduction to system theory]. Per. s nem./ K. Timofeeva. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo «Logos», 360 p.
Citing literature
Number of times cited according to Crossref: 3
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.