SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

RISK ANALYSIS WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - A REVIEW

Martina Zelenakova, Lenka Zvijakova, Daniel Peptenatu, Radu-Daniel Pintilii

First published: 2017-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/51/s20.109View metrics

Abstract

Opinions on the potential uses of risk analysis and environmental impact assessment (EIA) are different. Although many experts, researchers, practitioners and policy-makers agree that risk analysis is a valuable tool to inform decisions, they disagree about the extent to which risk estimates may be biased and should be allowed to influence public policies to protect health and the environment and to be used within the EIA process. The quality and value of any risk analysis depends on the adequacy of the data and the validity of the method. For environmental hazards and most health and ecological effects, data are limited, methods are controversial, and consequently, quantitative risk estimates are very imprecise and highly uncertain, offering little guidance to policy-makers. EIA offers an appropriate legal and procedural framework for the integration of risk assessment. The question is then why risk assessment has found only limited application in European EIA practice. One reason may be a widespread belief among the EIA community that risk assessment is complicated, difficult to communicate, and usually costly. This paper presents using of risk analysis methods and approaches in environmental impact assessment.

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
RISK ANALYSIS WITHIN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - A REVIEW
Authors
Martina Zelenakova, Lenka Zvijakova, Daniel Peptenatu, Radu-Daniel Pintilii
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2017, Ecology, Economics, Education and Legislation
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
835-844
SWS Citekey
Zelenakova201720835844
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-08-9
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References25
  1. Arthur, J.R., Bondad-Reantaso, M.G. Introductory training course on risk analysis for movements of live aquatic animals. FAO SAP, Samoa, p 167, 2012.

  2. Bedford, T., Cooke, R. Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

  3. Covello, V., Mumpower, J. Risk analysis and risk management: An historical perspective. Risk Analysis 5(2): 103-120, 1985.

  4. Graham, J.D. Historical perspective on risk assessment in the federal government. Toxicology 102(1-2): 29-52, 1995.

  5. McDaniels, T., Small, M. Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field (ed). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.

  6. Paustenbach, D.J. Retrospective on U.S. health risk assessment. How others can benefit. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 6: 283-332, 1995.

  7. Rechard, R.P. Historical relationship between performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal and other types risk assessment. Risk Analysis 19(5): 763-807, 1999.

  8. Bujoreanu, I.N. Risk analysis series part one - why risk analysis? J Def Resour Manage 3(1): 139-144, 2012.

  9. Welsh, T. Full Monte - The better approach to Schedule Risk Analysis. User guide. Tony Welsh, Barbecana, 2012.

  10. Aven, T. Risk Analysis. Wiley, Oxford, 2008.

  11. Al-Bahar, J.F., Crandall, K.C. Systematic Risk Management Approach for Construction Projects. J Constr Eng Manage 116(3): 533-546, 1990.

  12. Perry, J.G., Hayes, R.W. Risk and its Management in Construction Projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 1, v78, Design and Construction, Engineering Management Group, p 499-521, 1985.

  13. EPA (Environmental Protection Authority). Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in Western Australia. Perth, Western Australia, 2009.

  14. Gough, J.D. A strategic approach to the use of Environmental Impact Assessment and Risk Assessment within the decision-making process. Information Paper no. 13. Centre for Resource Management. University of Canterbury and Lincoln College. 1989

  15. Lexer, W., Paluchova, K., Schwarzl, B. Risk Assessment. IMProving the IMPlementation of Environmental Impact Assessment, „(IMP)3“. Risk Assessment D 3.2 Report WP 3. Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung, Vienna. http://www.umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/umweltthemen/UVP_SUP_EMAS/IMP/IMP3-Risk_Assessment.pdf, 2006.

  16. Brookes, A. Shared and integrative methods: Environmental risk assessment and risk management. In: Morris P, Therivel R (ed) Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2nd edn. Spon Press, London, p 351-364, 2001.

  17. Fairman, R., Mead, C.D., Williams, W.P. Environmental Risk Assessment – Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources. Monitoring and Assessment Research centre, King’s College, London. Published by European Environment Agency – EEA Environmental issue report No 4, 1999.

  18. Antunes, P., Santos, R. Integrated environmental management of the oceans. Ecological Economics 31(2): 215-226, 1999.

  19. Phillips, M.J., Subasinghe, R.P. Application of risk analysis to environmental issues in aquaculture. In: Bondad-Reantaso MG, Arthur JR, Subasinghe RP (ed) Understanding and applying risk analysis in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 519. Rome, FAO. p 101-119, 2008.

  20. Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L. Using Risk Analysis for Flood Protection Assessment. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 127p. 2017.

  21. Zeleňáková, M., Zvijáková, L. Risk analysis within environmental impact assessment of proposed construction activity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 62: 76-89. 2017.

  22. Zvijáková, L., Zeleňáková, M., Purcz, P. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Slovakia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 32(2): 150-161, 2014.

  23. Schierow LJ (2004) The Role of Risk Analysis and Risk Management in Environmental Protection, CRS Issue Brief for Congress, Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.

  24. Greiving S (2005) Impact Assessment as procedural framework for risk governance. Paper presentation at the Final Conference of the IMP3 Project “Improving European EIA-Implementation”, Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Austria, 22 November 2005

  25. Smejkal V, Rais V (2013) Risk management in firms and other companies (in Czech). Expert. Grada Publishing, Praha

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 3

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

SGEM scientific publications gain international visibility through a broad network of scholarly indexing and abstracting databases, citation-tracking services, research discovery platforms, and academic repositories.

Depending on the platform, our publications may be accessible as indexed bibliographic records, abstracts, citation data, DOI-linked metadata, or full-text scientific papers. Coverage and availability vary across platforms and publication years.

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate Databases

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Ulrichsweb

Global serials directory
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

Dimensions

Research discovery, citations
& metadata

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

Scilit

Scientific literature discovery
& metadata

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database