SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

EVALUATION OF EFFECTS RESULTING FROM INTENTIONAL OR ACCIDENTAL DETONATION OF EXPLOSIVE DEVICES BEFORE AND POST-EVENT

Gabriel Vasilescu, Robert László, Cristian Rădeanu, Florin Manea, Narcis Popa

First published: 2021-12-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2021/1.1/s03.047View metrics

Abstract

Unwanted effects of detonation of explosive materials (explosions) can occur due to deliberate actions (terrorist attack) or accidental. Modelling the effects of the explosion on the environment and the urban neighboring, occupies an important place in global and national research programs for the modernization of techniques for the safe use of explosives, in order to combat and operatively counter accidental explosions or those based on their use for terrorist purposes. The current trends are on the way to approximate as accurately as possible the manifestation of the effects of the explosion in order to anticipate the final results. This approach cannot be developed without addressing the interaction between explosive devices and the adjacent environment on which the effects caused by their detonation are manifested. These studies are performed on theoretical models that allow the approximation of the real conditions, encountered in practice. Subsequently, with the help of the experimentally obtained results, a large number of solutions for the design of security measures involving the intentional or accidental detonation of explosive devices can be verified. The paper presents a practical way to analyze, test, evaluate before and after the event of representative explosion scenarios, with the help of a specialized software application of American origin. Based on the results of grapho-analytical quantification of the specific associated hazards, an assessment is made of the risk situations generated by the detonation of explosive devices of different types and constructions, in order to determine the level of safety or the corresponding degree of insecurity.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
EVALUATION OF EFFECTS RESULTING FROM INTENTIONAL OR ACCIDENTAL DETONATION OF EXPLOSIVE DEVICES BEFORE AND POST-EVENT
Authors
Gabriel Vasilescu, Robert László, Cristian Rădeanu, Florin Manea, Narcis Popa
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 21st SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2021, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2021
Pages
259-268
SWS Citekey
Vasilescu20213379387
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-20-0
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References13
  1. American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE. (2000). Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd Edition (Second Edition). New York.

  2. Aven, T. (2008). Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities. Wiley.

  3. Cavender, F., Phillips, S., & Holland, M. (2008). Development of emergency response planning guidelines (ERPGs). Journal of Medical Toxicology, 4(2), 127–131. DOI: 10.1007/BF03160967.

  4. Darabont, D.-C., Moraru, R. I., Antonov, A. E., & Bejinariu, C. (2017). Managing new and emerging risks in the context of ISO 45001 standard. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 11–14.

  5. Department of Defense DoD. (2014). UFC 3-340-02. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Washington DC.

  6. Department of Defense DoD. (2016). UFC 4-023-03. Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse.

  7. Dinu, F., Dubina, D., & Marginean, I. (2015). Improving the structural robustness of multi-story steel-frame buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(8), 1028–1041. DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2014.927509.

  8. Dinu, F., Marginean, I., Dubina, D., Kovacs, A., & Ghicioi, E. (2017). Experimental testing and numerical modeling of steel frames under close-in detonations. Procedia Engineering, 210, 377–385. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.091.

  9. EN 1991-1-7. (2006). Eurocode 1 - Actions on structures - Part 1-7?: General actions - Accidental actions. European Committee for Standardisation CEN.

  10. Kovacs, A., Gheorghiosu, E., Vasilescu, G., Rus, D., & Jitea, I.-C. (2016). Analytical method for assessment of technological risk on controlled demolition with civil use explosives of mining industrial or civil objectives, ensuring a sustainable environment. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM?: Surveying Geology & Mining Ecology Management; Sofia, II, 41–48.

  11. Mazurkiewicz, L., Malachowski, J., & Baranowski, P. (2015). Blast loading influence on load carrying capacity of I-column. Engineering Structures, 104, 107–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.025.

  12. Moraru, R. I., Babut, G. B., & Cioca, L. I. (2014). Rationale and Criteria Development for Risk Assessment Tool Selection in Work Environments. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13(6), 1371–1376. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2014.147.

  13. Ross, T., Tatom, J., & et al. (2015). IMESAFR Version 2.0, Safety Assessment for Risk. Technical Manual. A-P-T Research Inc, USA: Institute of Makers of Explosives.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list