Scholarly record
RESTORATION OF SOIL QUALITY AFTER OIL POLLUTION
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References30
Dawson J.J.C., Godsiffe E.J., Thompson I.P., Ralebitso-Senior T.K., Killham K.S., Paton G.I. Application of biological indicators to assess recovery of hydrocarbon impacted soils, Soil Biology & Boichemistry, vol. 39, pp 164-177, 2007.
Kalinina O., Krause S.-E., Goryachkin S.V., Karavaeva N.A., Lyuri D.I., Giani L. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic chernozems of Russia: Soil development, carbon stocks, and dynamics of carbon pools, Geoderma, vol. 162, pp 196-206, 2011.
Selivanovskaya S. Yu., Gumerova R. Kh., Galitskaya P. Y. Assessing the Efficiency of methods for the bioremediation of oil production wastes, Contemporary Problems of Ecology, vol. 5 (6), pp. 542– 548, 2013.
Gumerova R.Kh., Galitskaya P.Y., Badrutdinov O.R., Selivanovskaya S.Y. Changes of hydrocarbon and oil fractions contents in oily waste treated by different methods of bioremediation, Oil Industry, vol. 9, pp. 145-146, 2013.
Mummey D.L., Stahl P.D., Buyer J.S. Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery following surface mine reclamation, Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 21, pp 251-259, 2002. Soil samples Cellulase activity, mg kg-1 Urease activity, mg NH4 kg-1 control, 3m 0-20cm 1239.4±111.2 775.1±84.2 20-40cm 1164.0±120.4 491.5±56.1 40-60cm 1100.5±101.8 383.1±37.1 oil, 3m 0-20cm 1214.7±112.5 49.3±5.7 20-40cm 1091.0±98.5 43.0±4.6 40-60cm 1134.5±99l.4 83.6±7.8 oil+dig, 3m 0-20cm 2009.6±205.3 309.0±35.8 20-40cm 1417.0±123.1 16.8±2.6 40-60cm 617.2±76.1 3.1±0.4 control, 36m 0-20cm 1100.0±100.4 742.9±67.8 20-40cm 980.0±86.3 553.4±62.4 40-60cm 535.3±67.3 289.4±30.1 oil, 36m 0-20cm 1133.4±121.4 88.0±8.1 20-40cm 1121.3±101.4 44.4±5.4 40-60cm 766.7±75.2 1.0±0.1 oil+dig, 36m 0-20cm 1423.6±134.2 252.1±26.7 20-40cm 1200.0±110.3 16.4±2.1 40-60cm 1016.6±101.5 2.4±0.3 Section Soils
Galitskaya, P.Y. , Gumerova, R.K. , Selivanovskaya, S.Y. Bioremediation of oil waste under field experiment, World Applied Sciences Journal , vol. 30 (11), pp 1694- 1698, 2014.
Selivanovskaya S.Y., Kuritsyn I.N., Akhmetzyanova L.G., Galitskaya P.Y., Solovjev D.A. Use of biological activity index for determination of the oil polluted area meant of remediation, Oil Industry, vol. 6, pp 102-103, 2012.
Wang B., Liu G.B., Xue S., Zhu B.B. Changes in soil physico-chemical and micribiological properties during natural succession on abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 62, pp 915-925, 2011.
Fereidooni M., Raiesi F., Fallah S. Ecological restoration of soil respiration, microbial biomass and enzyme activities through broiler littler application in a calcareous coil cropped with silage maize, Ecological Engineering, vol. 58, pp 266-277 , 2013.
Tejada M., Benitez C., Gomez I., Parrado J. Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community, Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 49, pp 11-17, 2011.
Kalinina O., Chertov O., Dolgikh A.V., Goryachkin S.V., Lyuri D.I., Vormstein S., Giani L. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Albeluvisols: Soil development, carbon stocks and dynamics of carbon pools, Geoderma, vol. 207 -208, pp 221-233, 2013.
The International Organization for Standardization. Soil quality – Determination of organic carbon by sulfochromic oxidation, ISO 14235, Switzerland, 1998.
Schinner F., Ohlinger R., Kandeler E., Margesin R. Methods in Soil Biology, in, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Germany, 1995.
The International Organization for Standardization. Soil Quality – Determination of soil microbial biomass - part 2: Fumigation-extraction method, ISO , Switzerland, 2009.
Pancholy S.K., Rice E.L. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase, and urease , Soil Science Society of American Journal, vol. 37 (1), pp 47-50, 197.
Dawson J.J.C., Godsiffe E.J., Thompson I.P., Ralebitso-Senior T.K., Killham K.S., Paton G.I. Application of biological indicators to assess recovery of hydrocarbon impacted soils, Soil Biology & Boichemistry, vol. 39, pp 164-177, 2007.
Kalinina O., Krause S.-E., Goryachkin S.V., Karavaeva N.A., Lyuri D.I., Giani L. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic chernozems of Russia: Soil development, carbon stocks, and dynamics of carbon pools, Geoderma, vol. 162, pp 196-206, 2011.
Selivanovskaya S. Yu., Gumerova R. Kh., Galitskaya P. Y. Assessing the Efficiency of methods for the bioremediation of oil production wastes, Contemporary Problems of Ecology, vol. 5 (6), pp. 542– 548, 2013.
Gumerova R.Kh., Galitskaya P.Y., Badrutdinov O.R., Selivanovskaya S.Y. Changes of hydrocarbon and oil fractions contents in oily waste treated by different methods of bioremediation, Oil Industry, vol. 9, pp. 145-146, 2013.
Mummey D.L., Stahl P.D., Buyer J.S. Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery following surface mine reclamation, Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 21, pp 251-259, 2002. Soil samples Cellulase activity, mg kg-1 Urease activity, mg NH4 kg-1 control, 3m 0-20cm 1239.4±111.2 775.1±84.2 20-40cm 1164.0±120.4 491.5±56.1 40-60cm 1100.5±101.8 383.1±37.1 oil, 3m 0-20cm 1214.7±112.5 49.3±5.7 20-40cm 1091.0±98.5 43.0±4.6 40-60cm 1134.5±99l.4 83.6±7.8 oil+dig, 3m 0-20cm 2009.6±205.3 309.0±35.8 20-40cm 1417.0±123.1 16.8±2.6 40-60cm 617.2±76.1 3.1±0.4 control, 36m 0-20cm 1100.0±100.4 742.9±67.8 20-40cm 980.0±86.3 553.4±62.4 40-60cm 535.3±67.3 289.4±30.1 oil, 36m 0-20cm 1133.4±121.4 88.0±8.1 20-40cm 1121.3±101.4 44.4±5.4 40-60cm 766.7±75.2 1.0±0.1 oil+dig, 36m 0-20cm 1423.6±134.2 252.1±26.7 20-40cm 1200.0±110.3 16.4±2.1 40-60cm 1016.6±101.5 2.4±0.3 Section Soils
Galitskaya, P.Y. , Gumerova, R.K. , Selivanovskaya, S.Y. Bioremediation of oil waste under field experiment, World Applied Sciences Journal , vol. 30 (11), pp 1694- 1698, 2014.
Selivanovskaya S.Y., Kuritsyn I.N., Akhmetzyanova L.G., Galitskaya P.Y., Solovjev D.A. Use of biological activity index for determination of the oil polluted area meant of remediation, Oil Industry, vol. 6, pp 102-103, 2012.
Wang B., Liu G.B., Xue S., Zhu B.B. Changes in soil physico-chemical and micribiological properties during natural succession on abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau, Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 62, pp 915-925, 2011.
Fereidooni M., Raiesi F., Fallah S. Ecological restoration of soil respiration, microbial biomass and enzyme activities through broiler littler application in a calcareous coil cropped with silage maize, Ecological Engineering, vol. 58, pp 266-277 , 2013.
Tejada M., Benitez C., Gomez I., Parrado J. Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community, Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 49, pp 11-17, 2011.
Kalinina O., Chertov O., Dolgikh A.V., Goryachkin S.V., Lyuri D.I., Vormstein S., Giani L. Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Albeluvisols: Soil development, carbon stocks and dynamics of carbon pools, Geoderma, vol. 207 -208, pp 221-233, 2013.
The International Organization for Standardization. Soil quality – Determination of organic carbon by sulfochromic oxidation, ISO 14235, Switzerland, 1998.
Schinner F., Ohlinger R., Kandeler E., Margesin R. Methods in Soil Biology, in, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Germany, 1995.
The International Organization for Standardization. Soil Quality – Determination of soil microbial biomass - part 2: Fumigation-extraction method, ISO , Switzerland, 2009.
Pancholy S.K., Rice E.L. Soil enzymes in relation to old field succession: amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase, and urease , Soil Science Society of American Journal, vol. 37 (1), pp 47-50, 197.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.

