Scholarly record
ANALITICAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY OF IMPACT LOADED CYLINDRICAL SAMPLE
Abstract
The fundamentals challenges of shock loading impact are known as complex nonlinear problems with variable contact conditions. Even the simplified solution of these problems often bring in essential mathematical complexity related with: shock or elastic waves parameters, distribution of contact stresses, elasto-plastic deformation of the bodies in collision, balance and dissipation of energy, and others. Therefore, and in practice we often use simplified analytical approaches to resolve engineering challenges even in not so sophisticated conditions. It is demonstrated that the static and dynamic contact forces in the interaction of solid bodies are reciprocally proportional and therefore it is possible to calculate the structure under impact loads using static methods and then the external forces, internal stresses and deformations, determined in such a way, are multiplied by the appropriate dynamic impact factor (DIF) for adequate model calculations. This is important for the design and applications in Defense, where the parameters of assessment of the impact resistance of solid materials and structural elements are understood as the ratio of the maximum dynamic to average static load. However, the DIF is taken by some authors also as ratio of the dynamic to static strength of the material and are often reported as a function of the strain rate. The tensile as well as shear strength are key material parameters in the analysis of structures under these conditions. They are generally determined using either a direct tensile test or an indirect splitting tensile test setup. Both tests are simple in concept, but have proven quite complicated to run in such a way that reliable results, independent of specimen and platens size, shapes, and boundary conditions, are often difficult to obtain. The indirect tensile testing method, known as the Brazilian Test, developed by Carneiro and Barcellos, has found widespread application because of its practical convenience for determining the static and dynamic tensile strength of rocks, concretes, glasses, and many other brittle and not quite brittle materials such as nuclear wastes, asphalt concretes and others. The Brazilian test has been reviewed and investigated by numerous scientists. However ever since the development of this method scientists have been interested in answering questions such as: why and when samples are not split along the loading diameter, as to the basic idea of the Brazilian test, but at some distance away from it; and how and why does the Brazilian test overestimate the tensile strength of these materials? In this paper we suggest formulas for the dynamic impact factor for Cylindrical Specimen applying the Standard Test Method for Splitting Strength of samples on the drop hammer facility and using the Split Hopkinson Pressure bar. The main solutions take into account several factors such as the nonlinear interaction between the loading bearing platens and specimen, the curvatures of the jaw surfaces, and elastic parameters of the materials. The DIF here is understood as the ratio of maximum dynamic load, internal stress and displacement from falling body related to the static load, stress and deformation, caused by the action of the weight of this body. The fundamental static challenges are solved by appling elasticity theory methods, and the analytical solutions are compared to the results of numerical modeling, conducted by "Rocksciense" under the Fase 2 program. These results show adequate agreement.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Fei Yang, Hongwei Ma, Lin Jing, Longmao Zhao, Zhihua Wang. “Dynamic compressive and splitting tensile tests on mortar using split Hopkinson pressure bar technique”, Lat. Am. j. solids struct. vol.12 no.4 Rio de Janeiro Aug. 2015
Carneiro F, Barcellos A. International association of testing and research laboratories for materials and structures. RILEM Bull 1953;13: 99–125.
ISRM Suggested Methods, Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring, Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1981, pp.119-121.
ASTM D 3967-08: Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 2008.
BS EN 12390-6:2000. British Standard.Testing hardened concrete. Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens
Feng Dai et.al. Some Fundamental Issues in Dynamic Compression and TensionTests of Rocks Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering · November 2010
Martina Scapin, Lorenzo Peroni, and Massimiliano Avalle. Dynamic Brazilian Test for Mechanical Characterization of Ceramic Ballistic Protection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Shock and Vibration, 2017
Sia Nemat-Nasser, L.B. Isaacs, J.E. Starrett. Hopkinson techniques for dynamic recovery experiments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, V. 435, Issue 1894 (Nov.8,1991), pp 371- 391.
Dzhaparidze L. A. Tensile testing of cylindrical specimens by the cleavage method. Journal of Mining Science. Springer v. 8, Issue 3, 1972, pp.331-334
Li DY, Wong LNY. The Brazilian disc test for rock mechanics applications: review and new insights. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 2013; 46 (2) :
Murali G. et.al. Impact Resistance and Strength Reliability of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Usind Two Parameter Weibull Distribution. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Vol. 9, no. 4, 2014.
Japaridze L.A. Shear Stresses in the Indirect Test of Tensile Strength of Rocks and Other Hard Materials. Bulletin of Georgia National Academy of Sciences, v.10, 3, 2016.
Muskhelishvili N. I. (1963). Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, 4th ed., Noordhoff, Groningen.
Japaridze L.A. (2015). Stress-deformed state of cylindrical specimens during indirect tensile strength testing. J. Rock Mech Geotech Eng; 7 (5): pp 509–518.
Q. Z. Wang, W.Li, X.L.Song. A Method for Testing Dynamic Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of Rock Materials Using SHPB. Pure appl. geophys. 163 (2006)
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.


