SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

WATER EROSION RISK ASSESSMENT, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOVAK AND POLISH PROCEDURES

Jakub Pagac, Edyta Kruk

First published: 2017-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/31/s12.100View metrics

Abstract

Given an example watershed, calculation of the long-term average annual soil loss by the universal soil loss equation (USLE) is analyzed taking into amount the Slovak and Polish approaches. Six factors are considered the rainfall erosivity factor (R), the soil erodibility factor (K), the topographic factors (LS) and the cropping management factors (C and P). Differences in input and methodology are highlighted. The example micro-watershed (the Matny stream basin in the Beskid Wyspowy, the western Carpath, Poland) is located in Poland on the boundary with Slovakia (area 1.47 km2, the catchment land use structure is dominated by grassland - 73.5%, arable land covers - 14.3%, forests account - 9.5% and urban areas - 2.7%). Mean height of the catchment is 582.66 m asl. Weighted mean slope for the entire catchment is 16.28%. The length of the main watercourse is 2.37 km and its average slope is 5.7%. The results include the calculation of erosion runoff areas by category (none to slight, medium, prominent, very prominent, catastrophal) in both countries.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1

Publication details

Title
WATER EROSION RISK ASSESSMENT, DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOVAK AND POLISH PROCEDURES
Authors
Jakub Pagac, Edyta Kruk
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2017, Water Resources. Forest, Marine and Ocean Ecosystems
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2017
Pages
793-800
SWS Citekey
Pagac201712793800
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-04-1
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References0
0references registered for this publication

Structured references will appear here after the reference import pass. The count is preserved now so the scholarly record is not incomplete.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list