SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE PLAUSIBLE WILDFIRE MODEL IN GEOINFORMATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR WILDFIRE RESPONSE

Zharikova, Marina, Sherstjuk, Vladimir, Baranovskiy, Nikolay

First published: 2015https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b32/s14.077View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 8

Publication details

Title
THE PLAUSIBLE WILDFIRE MODEL IN GEOINFORMATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR WILDFIRE RESPONSE
Authors
Zharikova, Marina, Sherstjuk, Vladimir, Baranovskiy, Nikolay
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, WATER RESOURCES. FOREST, MARINE AND OCEAN ECOSYSTEMS
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
575-584
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-37-7
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References30
  1. Ager, A. A. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl. Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 246, pp 45-56, 2007.

  2. Atkinson, D., Chladil, M., Janssen, V., Lucieer, A. Implementation of quantitative bushfire risk analysis in a GIS environment. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 19, pp -658, 2010.

  3. Baranovskiy, N., Zharikova, M. A web-oriented geoinformation system for forest fire danger prediction in typical forests of the Ukraine. Thematic cartography for International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org Section Forest Ecosystems the society. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, Springer, pp 13-22, 2014.

  4. Baranovsliy N.V. Integral assessment of forest fire danger. Ecology and Industry of Russia, vol 3, pp 58-59, 2010.

  5. Chuvieco, E., Aguadoa, I., Yebraa, M., Nietoa, H., and others. Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies. Ecological Modelling, vol. 221, pp 46-58, 2010.

  6. Genton, M., Butry, D. T., Gumpertz, M. L., Prestemon, J. P. Spatiotemporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 15, pp 87-97, 2006.

  7. Grab, M. V. Modeli, metodyi i algoritmyi rasprostraneniya lesnyih pozharov: diss. kand. tehn. nauk, Harkov, 230 p, 2004.

  8. Martinez, J., Vega-Garcia, C., Chuvieco, E. Human-caused wildfire risk rating for prevention planning in Spain. J. of Environmental Management, vol. 90, pp 1241- 1252, 2009.

  9. Miller, C., Ager, A. A. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management, Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol, 22, pp 1-14, 2013.

  10. Pawlak, Z. Vagueness – a Rough Set View. Structures in Logic and Computer Science, pp 106-117, 1997.

  11. Pawlak, Z., Jerzy, W., Slowinski, R., Ziarko, W. Rough Sets. Comm. of ACM, vol. 38(11), pp 88-95, 1995.

  12. Preisler, H., Brillinger, D.R., Burgan, E., Benoit, J.W. Probability based models for estimating wildfire risk. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 13, pp 133-142, 2004.

  13. Prestemon, J. P., Pye, J. M., Butry, D. T., Holmes, T. P., Mercer, D. E. Understanding broadscale wildfire risks in a human-dominated landscape. Forest Science, vol. 48, pp 685-693, 2002.

  14. Tolhurst, K., Shields, B., Chong, D. Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 23(4), pp 47- 54 , 2008.

  15. Zadeh, L. From computing with numbers to computing with words – from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. Int. J. of Applied Math. and Computer Science, vol. 12(3), pp 307-324, 2002. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

  16. Ager, A. A. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl. Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 246, pp 45-56, 2007.

  17. Atkinson, D., Chladil, M., Janssen, V., Lucieer, A. Implementation of quantitative bushfire risk analysis in a GIS environment. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 19, pp -658, 2010.

  18. Baranovskiy, N., Zharikova, M. A web-oriented geoinformation system for forest fire danger prediction in typical forests of the Ukraine. Thematic cartography for International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org Section Forest Ecosystems the society. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, Springer, pp 13-22, 2014.

  19. Baranovsliy N.V. Integral assessment of forest fire danger. Ecology and Industry of Russia, vol 3, pp 58-59, 2010.

  20. Chuvieco, E., Aguadoa, I., Yebraa, M., Nietoa, H., and others. Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies. Ecological Modelling, vol. 221, pp 46-58, 2010.

  21. Genton, M., Butry, D. T., Gumpertz, M. L., Prestemon, J. P. Spatiotemporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 15, pp 87-97, 2006.

  22. Grab, M. V. Modeli, metodyi i algoritmyi rasprostraneniya lesnyih pozharov: diss. kand. tehn. nauk, Harkov, 230 p, 2004.

  23. Martinez, J., Vega-Garcia, C., Chuvieco, E. Human-caused wildfire risk rating for prevention planning in Spain. J. of Environmental Management, vol. 90, pp 1241- 1252, 2009.

  24. Miller, C., Ager, A. A. A review of recent advances in risk analysis for wildfire management, Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol, 22, pp 1-14, 2013.

  25. Pawlak, Z. Vagueness – a Rough Set View. Structures in Logic and Computer Science, pp 106-117, 1997.

  26. Pawlak, Z., Jerzy, W., Slowinski, R., Ziarko, W. Rough Sets. Comm. of ACM, vol. 38(11), pp 88-95, 1995.

  27. Preisler, H., Brillinger, D.R., Burgan, E., Benoit, J.W. Probability based models for estimating wildfire risk. Int. J. of Wildland Fire, vol. 13, pp 133-142, 2004.

  28. Prestemon, J. P., Pye, J. M., Butry, D. T., Holmes, T. P., Mercer, D. E. Understanding broadscale wildfire risks in a human-dominated landscape. Forest Science, vol. 48, pp 685-693, 2002.

  29. Tolhurst, K., Shields, B., Chong, D. Phoenix: development and application of a bushfire risk management tool. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 23(4), pp 47- 54 , 2008.

  30. Zadeh, L. From computing with numbers to computing with words – from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. Int. J. of Applied Math. and Computer Science, vol. 12(3), pp 307-324, 2002. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list