SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENTS AND ESTIMATION OF PERMEABILITY OF SHALES IN SELECTED WELL SECTIONS FROM BALTIC BASIN (NORTHERN POLAND)

Bednarczyk, Sebastian, Krzyzak, Artur T., Machowski, Grzegorz

First published: 2016-06-28https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2016/b13/s06.097View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 2

Publication details

Title
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEASUREMENTS AND ESTIMATION OF PERMEABILITY OF SHALES IN SELECTED WELL SECTIONS FROM BALTIC BASIN (NORTHERN POLAND)
Authors
Bednarczyk, Sebastian, Krzyzak, Artur T., Machowski, Grzegorz
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration and Mining
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2016
Pages
769-776
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-57-5
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References28
  1. Poprawa, P., Development of the Caledonian collision zone along the western margin of Baltica and its relation to the foreland basin. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, Poland, 2006, 186, pp. 189-214.

  2. Modliński, Z., Szymański, B., Teller, L. , Lithostratigraphy of the Silurian in the Polish part of the Peri-Baltic Depression – onshore and offshore part (Northern Poland). Przegląd Geologiczny, Poland, 2006, 54, pp 787-796. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016

  3. Szymański, B. , Lithological and lithofacies record of the euxinic sediments of the Upper Cambrian and Tremadocian in the Baltic Depression (Northern Poland). Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, Poland, 2008, 430, pp 113-154.

  4. Poprawa, P., Shale gas potential of the Lower Palaeozoic complex in the Baltic Basin and Lublin-Podlasie Basin (Poland). Przegląd Geologiczny, Poland, 2010, 58 (3), pp 226-249.

  5. Shafer, J.L., Chen S., Georgi D.T., Protocols for calibrating NMR log-derived permeabilities. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. Toronto, Canada, SCA2005-37, pp 1-15, 2005.

  6. Zhang, X., Spiers, Ch.J., Peach, C.J., Hebing A., Tight rock permeability measurement by pressure pulse decay and modeling. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. Napa Valley, California, USA, SCA-2013-010, pp. 1-12, 2013.

  7. Weglarz W., Krzyzak A., Stefaniuk M., ZTE imaging of tight sandstone rocks at 9.4T - comparison with standard NMR analysis at 0.05 T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34/issue 4, 2016, pp 492-495 .

  8. Mao, Z.Q., Xiao, L., Wang, Z.N., Jin, Y., Liu, X.G., Xie, B., Estimation of Permeability by Integrating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs with mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data in tight gas sands. Applie d Magnetic Resonance, 44, 4, pp 449-468.

  9. Rezaee, R., Saeedi, A., Clennell, B. , Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, pp 92-99.

  10. Giesche, H., Mercury Porosimetry: A General (Practical) Overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 2006, vol. 23, 1, pp 9-19.

  11. Comisky, J.T., Santiago, M., McCollom B., Buddhala, A., Newsham, K.E., Sample Size Effects on the Application of Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure for Determining the Storage Capacity of Tight Gas and Oil Shales. Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary, Canada, CSUG/SPE 149432, pp 1-23, 2011.

  12. Katz, A.J., Thompson, A.H., Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review, B, 1986, 34, pp 8179-8191.

  13. Gao, Z., Hu, Q., Estimating permeability using median pore-throat radius obtained from mercury intrusion porosimetry. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2013, vol. 10, 2, pp 1-8.

  14. Pittman, E.D., Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1992, vol. 76, 2, pp 191-198. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

  15. Poprawa, P., Development of the Caledonian collision zone along the western margin of Baltica and its relation to the foreland basin. Prace Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, Poland, 2006, 186, pp. 189-214.

  16. Modliński, Z., Szymański, B., Teller, L. , Lithostratigraphy of the Silurian in the Polish part of the Peri-Baltic Depression – onshore and offshore part (Northern Poland). Przegląd Geologiczny, Poland, 2006, 54, pp 787-796. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2016

  17. Szymański, B. , Lithological and lithofacies record of the euxinic sediments of the Upper Cambrian and Tremadocian in the Baltic Depression (Northern Poland). Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego, Poland, 2008, 430, pp 113-154.

  18. Poprawa, P., Shale gas potential of the Lower Palaeozoic complex in the Baltic Basin and Lublin-Podlasie Basin (Poland). Przegląd Geologiczny, Poland, 2010, 58 (3), pp 226-249.

  19. Shafer, J.L., Chen S., Georgi D.T., Protocols for calibrating NMR log-derived permeabilities. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. Toronto, Canada, SCA2005-37, pp 1-15, 2005.

  20. Zhang, X., Spiers, Ch.J., Peach, C.J., Hebing A., Tight rock permeability measurement by pressure pulse decay and modeling. International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. Napa Valley, California, USA, SCA-2013-010, pp. 1-12, 2013.

  21. Weglarz W., Krzyzak A., Stefaniuk M., ZTE imaging of tight sandstone rocks at 9.4T - comparison with standard NMR analysis at 0.05 T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 34/issue 4, 2016, pp 492-495 .

  22. Mao, Z.Q., Xiao, L., Wang, Z.N., Jin, Y., Liu, X.G., Xie, B., Estimation of Permeability by Integrating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs with mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) data in tight gas sands. Applie d Magnetic Resonance, 44, 4, pp 449-468.

  23. Rezaee, R., Saeedi, A., Clennell, B. , Tight gas sands permeability estimation from mercury injection capillary pressure and nuclear magnetic resonance data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2012, pp 92-99.

  24. Giesche, H., Mercury Porosimetry: A General (Practical) Overview. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 2006, vol. 23, 1, pp 9-19.

  25. Comisky, J.T., Santiago, M., McCollom B., Buddhala, A., Newsham, K.E., Sample Size Effects on the Application of Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure for Determining the Storage Capacity of Tight Gas and Oil Shales. Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. Calgary, Canada, CSUG/SPE 149432, pp 1-23, 2011.

  26. Katz, A.J., Thompson, A.H., Quantitative prediction of permeability in porous rock. Physical Review, B, 1986, 34, pp 8179-8191.

  27. Gao, Z., Hu, Q., Estimating permeability using median pore-throat radius obtained from mercury intrusion porosimetry. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2013, vol. 10, 2, pp 1-8.

  28. Pittman, E.D., Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1992, vol. 76, 2, pp 191-198. 16th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2016 www.sgem.org

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list