Scholarly record
SUPPORT OF POST-INDUSTRIAL AREA MANAGEMENT
Abstract
Critical literature studies indicated that there had been numerous methods for estimating the value, management models as well as indicators and criteria for the quantitative and qualitative assessment of post-industrial areas. All of them supported post-industrial area management, but neither of them took into account the simultaneous evaluation of economic, social and environmental aspects - especially important for the inclusion of these areas into the socio-economic cycle. Identified gaps in knowledge allowed us to make assumptions for the elaboration of the model for the post-industrial areas evaluation in accordance with the principles of sustainable development. The model developed enabled us to rank decision options, from the most optimal scenario for a given area to the least, taking into account the selected criteria allowing for a multifaceted assessment of these areas including ecological, economic and social aspects. The model indicated directions for the redevelopment of these areas. The need for the degraded areas to perform a new function generating benefits in the socio-economic sphere was a response to the sustainability challenges as well as circular economy approach in the region of Silesia. Efficient implementation of this process has been affected by many informational, financial and systemic barriers, that is the limited availability of data, unsettled legal status, insufficient technical infrastructure and environmental contamination. These barriers were reflected in the model. As the final effect, an indicator of the post-industrial areaпїЅs value for sustainable development was obtained. Considering the number of post-industrial areas and the scale and dynamics of negative phenomena occurring in these areas, especially in the aforementioned region, such an valuation approach will facilitate the management of post-industrial areas and support the decision-making process regarding investments in these areas as well as reduce pressure on green areas and follow the paradigm of circular regional flow.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References15
Amekudzi A., McNeil S., Koutsopoulos H.N., Assessing extrajurisdictional and areawide impacts of clustered brownfield developments. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 129, 1, 2003, pp.27
Bondaruk J., Zawartka P., Public Information Platform "Post-industrial and degraded areas" (OPI TPP) - modern tool for information management system regarding post-industrial areas in Silesia Voivodeship. Prace naukowe GIG, Górnictwo i Środowisko, 4, 2011, pp. 31 - 49
DeSousa C.A., Wu C., Westphal L.M., Assessing the effect of publicly assisted brownfield redevelopment on surrounding property values. Economic Development Quarterly, 23, 2, 2009, pp. 95-110
Evans A., The economics of vacant land. Recycling the city: the use and reuse of urban land. Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Cambridge 2004, pp. 53-63
Frantál B., Kunc J., Klusáček P., Martinát S., Assessing success factors of brownfields regeneration: international and inter-stakeholder perspective. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 44, 2015, pp. 91-10
Janik A., The multi-criteria method of degraded lands valuation. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, s. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 62, Gliwice 2012, pp. 57 - 79
Kaufman D., Cloutier N., The impact of small brownfields and greenspaces on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 33, 1, 2006, pp. 19-30
Kurtovića S., Siljkovićb B., Pavlovićc N., Methods of identification and evaluation of brownfield sites. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 3, 2, 2014, pp. 105
Morio M., Schädler S., Finkel M., Applying a multi-criteria genetic algorithm framework for brownfield reuse optimization: Improving redevelopment options based on stakeholder preferences. Journal of Environmental Management, 130, 2013, pp. 331- 346
Pediaditi K., Doick K.J., Moffat A.J., Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield, regeneration to greenspace initiatives. A meta-evaluation of assessment and monitoring tools. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 2010, pp. 22-36
Prusak A., Strojny J., Stefanów P., Analityczny proces hierarchiczny (AHP) na skróty-kluczowe pojęcia i literatura, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 19.21, 2014, pp. 179-192
Ryan R.L., The social landscape of planning: Integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100/4, 2011, pp. 361-363
Saaty T.L., Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. Analytic Hierarchy Process, 6, Pittsburgh 2000
Schädler S., Morio M., Bartke S., Rohr-Zänker R., Finkel M., Designing sustainable and economically attractive brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2011, pp. 827-837
Thomas M.R., A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 2002, pp. 26-30.
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
