SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

THE ACCURACY OF POLYMETALLIC NODULE RESOURCES ESTIMATION IN THE PACIFIC IN THE IOM AREA BASED ON A SAMPLES COLLECTED USING A BOX CORER

J. Mucha

First published: 2019-06-20https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2019/1.1/s01.072View metrics

Abstract

One of many factors determining the success of the future exploitation of oceanic polymetallic nodules is the amount of resources and the accuracy of their estimation. The potential exploitation requires accurate estimation of resources classified as measured resources according to the Australian JORC Code (The Joint Ore Reserves Committee Code). The issue of the accuracy of polymetallic nodule resources estimation was analyzed in the area of the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone in the Pacific administered by the InterOceanMetal Joint Organization (IOM), the contractor of the International Seabed Authority (ISA) since 2001. The area of about 4 200 km2 selected for the analysis is one of the most prospective ones due to the abundance of nodules. The analysis was based on samples collected from the ocean floor using a box corer operated from the research ship. The average distance between sampling sites was about 8 km. The assessment of the accuracy of estimates was made for 15 square calculation blocks with a side of 17 km and an area of 300 km2. They roughly correspond to the areas of annual exploitation, assuming that the average abundance of wet nodules is 10 [kg/m2] and the annual production is 3 million tons. The use of geostatistical block kriging enabled to determine relative standard kriging errors as a measure of the accuracy of estimates of nodule resources. To minimize the risk of mining investment, it was assumed that the nodule resources estimation error in the case of calculation blocks corresponding to the areas of annual exploitation must not exceed 5%. The calculated estimation errors range from 10.6% to 26.6% (with a median equal to 13.1%) and are much higher than the assumed threshold value of 5%. The low accuracy of polymetallic nodule resources estimation is due to the small volume of samples collected by box corer, the large distance between sample collection points, and a relatively high regional (with a coefficient of variation close to 40%), and local variability in the abundance of nodules (discontinuous variation) as indicated by the nugget effect in the geostatistical semivariogram. Subsequent simulations have confirmed that achieving the assumed accuracy would require the collection of a large number of samples from the ocean floor, which is unrealistic given the huge labor intensity and high costs. The only rational way to achieve the assumed accuracy is to combine resource estimates based on box corer sampling method with an additional polymetallic nodule resources estimation based on bottom photographs, taken by the research ship or AUV (Autonomous Underwater Vehicle).

Publication Impact Profile

Publication details

Title
THE ACCURACY OF POLYMETALLIC NODULE RESOURCES ESTIMATION IN THE PACIFIC IN THE IOM AREA BASED ON A SAMPLES COLLECTED USING A BOX CORER
Authors
J. Mucha
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 19th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings19th, Science and Technologies in Geology, Exploration And Mining
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2019
Pages
585-592
SWS Citekey
Mucha20191585592
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7408-76-8
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References13
  1. Chan-Young Park, Seung-Ho Park, Choon-Woo Kim, Jung-Keuk Kang, Ki-Hyune Kim, An Image Analysis Technique for Exploration of Manganese Nodules, Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 17:4, 371-386, DOI: 10.1080/106411999273684, 1999.

  2. Deutsch C.V., Journel A.G., GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide. Oxford University Press, 340 p., 1992.

  3. Felix D., Some problems in making nodule abundance estimates from sea floor photographs, Marine Mining, 2(3), pp 293-302, 1980.

  4. Isaaks, E.H., Srivastava, R.M., An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., 1989.

  5. Journel, A.G., Huijbregts, C.J., Mining Geostatistics. London Academic Press, 600 p., 1978.

  6. Kotliński, R.A., Activities of the Interoceanmetal Joint Organization (IOM) in relation to deep seabed mineral resources development, Proc. Seabed: The New Frontier, ISA, Madrid, Spain, 29 p., 2010.

  7. Mucha J., Wasilewska-Błaszczyk M., Estimating the resources of polymetallic nodules in the Pacific on the basis of their genetic characteristics and geostatistical methods (Clarion-Clipperton Zone, The Interoceanmetal area), Proc. of 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM2018, 2 July – 8 July 2018, Albena, Bulgaria, vol. 18, is. 1.3, Exploration and Mining, pp 407-414, 2018.

  8. Mucha J., Wasilewska-Błaszczyk M., Kotliński R.A., Maciąg Ł., Variability and Accuracy of Polymetallic Nodules Abundance Estimations in the IOM Area – Statistical and Geostatistical Approach, Proc. of the Tenth ISOPE Ocean Mining and Gas Hydrates Symposium, ISOPE OMS, Szczecin, Poland, September 22-26 2013, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, pp 27-31, 2013.

  9. Okazaki M., Tsune A., Exploration of polymetallic nodule using AUV in the central equatorial pacific, Proc. of the ISOPE Ocean Mining Symposium, Szczecin, Poland, September 22-26, pp. 32-38, 2013.

  10. Park S.H, Kim D.H., Kim C.W., Park C.Y., Kang J.K., Estimation of coverage and size distribution of manganese nodules based in image processing Techniques, Proc. of the Second Ocean Mining Symposium, Seoul, Korea, November 24-26, 1997, The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers ,40-44, 1997.

  11. Sharma R., Khadge N.H., Sankar S. Jai, Assessing the distribution and abundance of seabed minerals from seafloor photography data in the Central Indian Ocean Basin, Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 34, 1691-1706, 2013.

  12. Schoening T., Kuhn T., Jones D.O.B., Simon-Lledo E., Nattkemper T.W., Fully automated image segmentation for benthic resource assessment of poly-metallic nodules, Methods in Oceanography, vol. 15-16, pp. 78-89, 2016.

  13. Tsune A., Okazaki M., Some Consideration about Image Analysis of Seafloor Photographs for Better Estimation of Parameters of Polymetallic Nodule Distribution, Proc. of the Twenty-fourth International Ocean and Polar Engineers (ISOPE), Busan, Korea, June 15-20, pp. 72-77, 2014.

Citing literature

Number of times cited according to Crossref: 2

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list

Connected events

SGEM WORLD SCIENCE Conferences

The EPS Library connects published research with the scientific events where it was presented, reviewed and prepared for long-term scholarly discovery.

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM
SGEM GeoConference

International Scientific GeoConference SGEM

Explore the main SGEM WORLD SCIENCE forum for Earth and Planetary Sciences, where research becomes conference presentation, proceedings publication and long-term library visibility.

Visit sgem.org
SGEM Vienna Green
SGEM Vienna Green

Green Sciences and Sustainability

Explore SGEM Vienna Green — connecting sustainability, environmental science, climate research, green technologies and interdisciplinary solutions for the future.

Visit sgemviennagreen.org

International Indexing & Global Visibility of Our Scientific Publications

Scopus

Scopus Scientific Database

Compendex

Engineering abstracts
& indexing

Clarivate

Scientific Databases

EBSCO

EBSCO
Science Services Database

OpenAIRE

Linked research discovery
& metadata

ProQuest

Scientific Databases
Part of Clarivate

Crossref

We are a voting CrossRef member - the official DOI provider

ScienceOpen

Research discovery
& metadata

HAL

Multidisciplinary archive
& metadata

Petroleum Abstracts

Scientific Database
Part of Clarivate

Google Scholar

Google Scholar
Scholarly Search

RSCI

Russian Science Citation Index
Part of Web of Science

OpenAlex

Open research index
& metadata

Mendeley

Scientific Databases
Part of Elsevier

GeoRef

GeoRef — AGI
Geoscience Bibliographic Database