SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

SUSTAINABLE AND RATIONAL UTILIZATION OF UNUSED RAILWAY LINES

Aimilia Lempesi, Christodoulos Daoutis

First published: 2025-08-15https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2025/5.1/s19.029View metrics

Abstract

Abandoned railway lines can be used as hiking trails for tourism development and as coherent eco-logical routes for many species of flora and fauna, such as plants, insects, and birds. The study's objective was to design a strategic plan for using unused railway lines that will increase or maintain the biodiversity in the Prefecture of Peloponnese in southern Greece. The SWOT-AHP-TOWS method analysis was used. The criteria of the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) method were recorded based on the literature review. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method, in which the criteria were compared pairwise and using the TOWS (Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths) method which combines factors into groups and proposes strategies to the policymakers. The study found that the Strengths group occupied the largest percentage (41.9%), and the Opportunities group had the smallest percentage (14.3%). The results also showed that in the comparisons of the Strengths group, the largest percentage (31.5%) held the (Vegetation along unused railway lines can act as a refuge for birds) criterion. In the comparisons of the Weaknesses group, it was observed that the (Causing animal deaths by train collision) criterion gathered a large percentage of 44.4%. In the comparisons of the Opportunities group, the largest percentage (35.2%) held the (Railway embankments can provide important habitats for pollinators and birds) criterion and from the comparisons of the Threats group (The construction of railways contributes to the loss of habitats of wild fauna and flora) criterion was the biggest threat with a percentage that exceeds 32.7%. The most important strategy of the TOWS method was (Achieving rail network utilization for recreational use and reducing habitat loss).

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 1
Dimensions ID: pub.1195348583

Publication details

Title
SUSTAINABLE AND RATIONAL UTILIZATION OF UNUSED RAILWAY LINES
Authors
Aimilia Lempesi, Christodoulos Daoutis
Proceedings
25th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings SGEM2025, Ecology, Environmental Economics, Education, and Legislation, Vol25, Issue 5.1.
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2025
Pages
243-252
SWS Citekey
Lempesi202519243252
ISSN
1314-2704; 13142704
ISBN
9786197603859
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References19
  1. Kantartzis A., Lemonakis P., Malesios C., Daoutis C., Galatsidas S., Arabatzis G., Attitudes and Views of Citizens Regarding the Contribution of the Trail Paths in Protection and Promotion of Natural Environment, Land, vol. 11/issue 9, 1585, 2022, DOI: 10.3390/land11091585

  2. Acevedo-Duque �., Llanos-Herrera G. R., Garcia-Salirrosas E. E., Sim�n-Isidoro S., �lvarez-Herranz A. P., �lvarez-Becerra R., Sanchez Diaz L. C., Scientometric Analysis of Hiking Tourism and Its Relevance for Wellbeing and Knowledge Management, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19/issue 14, 8534, 2022, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148534

  3. Willard P., Beeton, S., Low impact experiences: Developing successful rail trail tourism, Tourism Planning & Development, vol. 9/issue 1, pp 5-13, 2012, DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2012.653476

  4. Noh Y., Does converting abandoned railways to greenways impact neighboring housing prices?, Landscape and urban planning, vol. 183, pp 157-166, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.11.002

  5. Moron D., Skorka P., Lenda M., Rozej-Pabijan E., Wantuch M., Kajzer-Bonk J., Celary W., Mielczarek L. M, Tryjanowski P., Railway embankments as new habitat for pollinators in an agricultural landscape, PloS one, vol. 9/issue 7, e101297, 2014, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101297

  6. Marti-Henneberg J., European integration and national models for railway networks (1840�2010), Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 26, pp 126-138, 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.09.004

  7. Tikka P. M., H�gmander H., Koski P. S., Road and railway verges serve as dispersal corridors for grassland plants, Landscape ecology, vol. 16, pp 659-666, 2001, DOI: 10.1023/A:1013120529382

  8. Lenda M., Sk�rka P., Moron D., Rosin Z. M., Tryjanowski P., The importance of the gravel excavation industry for the conservation of grassland butterflies, Biological Conservation, vol. 148/issue 1, pp 180-190, 2012, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.014

  9. Sk�rka P., Martyka R., W�jcik J. D., Babiarz T., Sk�rka J., Habitat and nest site selection in the Common Gull Larus canus in southern Poland: significance of man-made habitats for conservation of an endangered species, Acta Ornithologica, vol. 41/issue 2, pp 137-144, 2006, DOI: 10.3161/000164506780143889 https://doi.org/10.3161/068.041.0210

  10. Dylewski L., Tobolka, M., Unused railway lines as a contributor to bird abundance, species richness and diversity in intensively managed farmland, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 326, 107820, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107820

  11. Kociolek A. V., Clevenger A. P., St. Clair C. C., Proppe D. S., Effects of road networks on bird populations, Conservation Biology, vol. 25/issue 2, pp 241-249, 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01635.x

  12. Tikka P. M., Koski P. S., Kivel� R. A., Kuitunen M. T., Can grassland plant communities be preserved on road and railway verges?, Applied Vegetation Science, vol. 3/issue 1, pp 25-32, 2000, DOI: 10.2307/1478915

  13. Barrientos R., Ascens�o F., Beja P., Pereira H. M., Borda-de-�gua L., Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences, European journal of wildlife research, vol. 65/no 12, 2019, DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1248-0

  14. Fahrig L., Rytwinski T., Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis, Ecology and society, vol. 14/no 1, 2009, DOI: 10.5751/ES-02815-140121

  15. Forman R. T., Alexander L. E., Roads and their major ecological effects, Annual review of ecology and systematics, vol. 29/issue 1, pp 207-231, 1998, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207

  16. Van Rooyen C., Bird impact assessment study, Kusile Railway Line and associated infrastructure, Report, Robindale, South Africa, 28pp, 2009,

  17. Kurttila M., Pesonen M., Kangas J., Kajanus M., Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis�a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case, Forest policy and economics, vol. 1/issue 1, pp 41-52, 2000, DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(99)00004-0

  18. Weihrich H., The TOWS matrix�A tool for situational analysis, Long range planning, vol. 15/issue 2, pp 54-66, 1982, DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0 250

  19. Saaty R. W., The analytic hierarchy process�what it is and how it is used, Mathematical modelling, vol. 9/issue 3-5, pp 161-176, 1987, DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list