Scholarly record
IMPORTANCE OF NATURE CLOSE RESTORATION OF MINING SITES
Abstract
Sites that arise after mining in our country are mostly unique habitats and should be dealt adequately. This fact is valid in particular for smaller sites of mining and mineral extraction. However, the restoration should not rely just on spontaneous succession. If there in the area are developing or is there a prerequisite of development of plant communities with important species (refuge, hot spots), it is always necessary to support the development of desirable successional stages, and, vice versa eliminate invasive species or overgrowing of shrubs and trees. The mining site/area should be viewed sites improving biodiversity of present very uniform landscape. Work is the outcome of the project TA?R "TB030MZP114пїЅ Options of nature close restoration of the territories after mining following on the data resulting from another R&D project пїЅSp/2d1/07", which was implemented in the years 2015-2016. The study is intended for conservation agencies as an example of what you can expect from these sites and how to manage them to maximize their contribution to the diversity of our nature.
Publication Impact Profile
Publication details
References10
Gremlica T., Cílek V., Vrabec V., Zavadil V., Lepšová A. (2011). Využívání přirozené a usměrňované ekologické sukcese při rekultivacích území dotčených těžbou nerostných surovin. Ústav pro ekopolitiku, o. p. s., Praha.
Prikryl, I. (2003). Vody vznikající v souvislosti s těžbou uhlí. In.: Conference procceedings Hnědé uhlí, Most. 94 – 99.
Chuman, T. (2015). Restoration Practices Used on Post Mining Sites and Industrial Deposits in the Czech Republic with an Example of Natural Restoration of Granodiorite Quarries and Spoil Heaps. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 8(2), 29-46.
Prach, K., Řehounková, K., Řehounek, J., Konvalinková, P. (2011). Ecological restoration of central European mining sites: a summary of a multi-site analysis. Landscape Research, 36(2), 263-268.
Lupp, G., Höchtl, F., Wende, W. (2011). “Wilderness”– A designation for Central European landscapes?. Land Use Policy, 28(3), 594-603.
Přikryl I., Lepšová A., Frouz J., Chanas P., Pecharová E., Drábek K., Volf O., Farkač J., Vrabec V., Straka J., Zavadil V., Kosík M., Kašparová I., Gremlica T., Holec M. (2016). Možnosti přírodě blízkých způsobů obnovy na územích na těžbě nerostných surovin vyplývajících z konsolidace 54 dat výsledků průzkumů v dosud nezkoumaných krajích ČR s daty zjištěnými VaV SP/2d1/141/07. Enki o.p.s. Třeboň, Třeboň
Tropek, R., Kadlec, T., Karesova, P., Spitzer, L., Kocarek, P., Malenovsky, I., Banar, P., Tuf, I. H., Hejda, M., Konvicka, M. (2010). Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47: 139–147.
Wiegleb, G., Bröring, U., Choi, G., Dahms, H. U., Kanongdate, K., Byeon, C. W., Ler, L. G. (2013). Ecological restoration as precaution and not as restitutional compensation. Biodiversity and conservation, 22(9), 1931-1948.
Chytrý, M., Kučera, T., Kočí, M., Grulich, V., Lustyk, P. (2001). Katalog biotopů České republiky. Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha.
Zdražil, V., Zavadil, V., Volf, O., Sádlo, J., Přikryl, I., Martiš, M., Cílek V., Bureš J., Gremlica, T. (2004). Obnova krajiny Kladenska narušené dobýváním: Návrh strategie obnovy ekologických a estetických funkcí krajiny Kladenska v jejích částech narušených těžbou černého uhlí.Project report, Ústav pro ekopolitiku o.p.s., Praha
View or Download full articleAccess options
SWS access login
Login as SWS Scientific CommitteeLogin as SWS Scientific PartnerLogin as SWS AuthorAuthors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.
For librarian assistance: [email protected]
Purchase Instant Access
- Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
- Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
- Article cannot be redistributed.
