SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND PATIENT SATISFACTION RELATION

S: K. Temizyurek

First published: 2009DOI pendingView metrics

Abstract

In medical sector, the expectation of both hospital administration and patients is quite much today, in parallel with the rapid development of information technologies. The increment in culture and consciousness level of people increases their better medical service taking wish. This situation is possible with more qualified service given by the foundations offering medical service and being satisfied of the service customers from the service they have taken. In total quality management; various parameters are effective such as the offering method of the service, the continuity of the service and the satisfactoriness and sensitivity of the medical staff. Furthermore, the patient right and health literacy levels of the service customers should be high. The determination of the patient satisfaction depending on the environment and health sensitivity level of both medical foundations and patients is the main aim of this research. In this study, a sensitivity survey has been applied to the patients in a public medical foundation. The relations between total quality management and patient satisfaction have been examined by considering the questioning done with different parameters and the results obtained from the findings.

Publication details

Title
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND PATIENT SATISFACTION RELATION
Authors
S: K. Temizyurek
Proceedings
9th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2009
Publisher
SGEM Scientific GeoConference
Year
2009
Pages
777-784
ISSN
Not available yet
ISBN
954-91818-1-2
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Keywords
References21
  1. Chris Marsden and Jorg Andriof, “Understandin Influence It,” Working Paper, (Coventry, Engla Warwick Business School,

  2. 1997. Business for Social Responsibility, “Introductio (San Francisco: BSR,

  3. 1998): quote at p.

  4. 1. Michael A. Berry and Dennis A. Rondinelli, “P New Industrial Revolution,” The Academy of M (1998): 38-50. Environmental Economics with regards the corporate social responsibility ctivity levels, which they may implement. y adhere to all laws and regulations and select d communities that also directly contributes to the market; te benefits in which they undertake activities ns to benefit stakeholders and communities in and medium-term benefits to the company; m benefits in which they support community that will have important impacts on continuing ch they support or participate in activities that for stakeholders with no expectation of direct ractices have become an integral part of the institutions. Corporate social responsibility nstitute environmental responsibility or that utions have a considerable force in their hands lopment. If they are realistically and carefully w alliances promoting corporate citizenship for e adverse environmental impacts of business clean manufacturing and pollution prevention ronmentally neutral or beneficial products and ources and improve environmental conditions tanding Corporate Citizenship and How to England: BP Corporate Citizenship Unit, duction to Corporate Social Responsibility,” . lli, “Proactive Environmental Management: A y of Management Executive, Vol. 12, No. 2 International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfe

  5. Marcus, A 2002,

  6. Companies, New York.

  7. CAMAC, Corporations and Markets Adv Responsibility of Companies, December, Sydn

  8. Crook, C 2005, ‘The union of concerned ex viewed 3 February 2007, http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystor

  9. EIA, Ethical Investment Association 2006, Australia

  10. - 2006: A benchmarking survey, Se

  11. ADL, Arthur D Little Limited 2003, Th

  12. Responsibility, December, Cambridge.

  13. Aupperle, K, Carroll, A ve Hatfield, J 1985 relationship between corporate social resp Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, no

  14. CAMAC, Corporations and Markets Adviso Responsibility of Companies, December, Sydne Globescan Inc 2005, Definition of corporate s in 3 February 2007, http://www.globescan.com Hill and Knowlton 2006, Return on Reputat

  15. 2006, Mart, New York.

  16. PJC, Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corpo Corporate responsibility: Managing risk and c http://h2e.ashes.org. SAM Indexes GmBH 2003, Results of DJS

  17. September, Zurich.

  18. 002, Investments, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill Advisory Committee 2006, The Social Sydney. ed executives’, The Economist, 20 January, aystory.cfm?story_id=3555194

  19. 006, Sustainable responsible investment in ey, September, Sydney , The Business Case for Corporate

  20. 1985 “An empirical examination of the responsibility and profitability”, The

  21. 8, no 2, June, pp 446-43 Advisory Committee 2006, The Social Sydney. rate social responsibility survey, viewed n.com/rf_csr_first_01.htm. eputation: Corporate Reputation Watch Corporations and Financial Services 2006, and creating value, June, Canberra. DJSI Review 2003, Press Bulletin, 4

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list