SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

PROPOSAL OF URBAN PLAN SYMBOLOGY STANDARDIZATION: OLOMOUC REGION CASE STUDY

Burian, Jaroslav, Brychtova, Alzbeta, Vavra, Ales

First published: 2015https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b22/s11.131View metrics

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 4
PLUMX see details

Publication details

Title
PROPOSAL OF URBAN PLAN SYMBOLOGY STANDARDIZATION: OLOMOUC REGION CASE STUDY
Authors
Burian, Jaroslav, Brychtova, Alzbeta, Vavra, Ales
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference EXPO Proceedings; 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015, INFORMATICS, GEOINFORMATICS AND REMOTE SENSING
Publisher
Stef92 Technology
Year
2015
Pages
1051-1062
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7105-35-3
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
References46

  1. Brychtova, A. & Coltekin, A. (2014): An Empirical User Study for Measuring the Influence of Colour Distance and Font Size in Map Reading Using Eye Tracking. The Cartographic Journal, DOI: 10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000103

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  2. Burian, J. & Šťávová, Z. (2009): Cartographic and geoinformatics mistakes in urban plans. Geografie 114:179– 191.

  3. Burian, J., Brus, J., Voženílek, V. (2013): Development of Olomouc city in 1930– 2009: based on analysis of functional areas, Journal of Maps, vol. 9, pp. 64-67.

  4. Churchill, R. (2010): Urban cartography and the mapping of Chicago. Geogr Rev 94:1– 22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00155.x

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  5. Deeb, R., Ooms, K., Brychtová, A., Van Eetvelde, V., and De Maeyer, P. (2014): Background and foreground interaction: Influence of complementary colors on the searc h task. Color Research & Application, pp. n/a DOI: 10.1002/col.21920

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  6. Dühr, S. (2004): The form, style, and use of cartographic visualizations in European spatial planning: examples from England and Germany. Environ Plan A 36:1961– 1989. DOI: 10.1068/a35262

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  7. Dühr, S. (2007): The visual language of spatial planning. 224 pp.

  8. Hydrosoft Veleslavín (2005): The minimal standard for digital processing of regional municipality and town plans in GIS. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015

  9. Hydrosoft Veleslavín (2000): Methodology of a digital processing of a regional municipality plan for GIS in public administration for a district council.

  10. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (2006): Act No. 183/2006 Coll., Construction Act.

  11. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (2006): Ministry Decree No. 500/2006 Coll.

  12. Ministry of Environment of Norway (2001): Reguleringsplan Bebyggelsesplan. 142.

  13. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (1976): Act No. 50/1976 Coll.

  14. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (1999): Uniform standard of map symbology for a main regional municipality plan and the Regulatory plan.

  15. Monmonier, M. (1996): How to Lie with Maps (2nd Edition), 207 pp.

  16. Pál, S. (2010): Different cartographic visualiz ations of spatial structure in the documents of Hungarian spatial policies. RSA 2010 Annu. Int. Conf. “Regional Responses to Glob. Shifts Actors, Institutions Organ. 15 pp.

  17. Pareta, K. (2012): Urban land use planning using digital cartographic modelling . Urban L Use Plan using Digit Cartographical Model 2:p 356–369.

  18. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny (2002): Rysunek budowlany - Oznaczenia graficzne stosowane w projektach zagospodarowania działki lub terenu. 18 pp.

  19. Sluter, R. (2001): New theoretical research trends in cartography. Rev Bras Cartogr 29–37.

  20. Šťávová, Z. (2008): Inconsistencies cartographic symbolism in the planning document ation. Czech geography in European space, p 1

  21. Tang, X. & Hurni, L. (2009): Regional spatial planning maps: A Sino-Swiss comparison of cartographic visualization methodologies. 24th Int. Cartogr. Conf. - World’s GeoSpatial Solut. 2009. International Cartographic Association, 14 pp.

  22. T-MAPY (2001): Methodology of digital processing of RPD for GIS.

  23. T-MAPY (2004): Integrated approach for digital processing of regional municipality plan for GIS.

  24. Brychtova, A. & Coltekin, A. (2014): An Empirical User Study for Measuring the Influence of Colour Distance and Font Size in Map Reading Using Eye Tracking. The Cartographic Journal, DOI: 10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000103

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  25. Burian, J. & Šťávová, Z. (2009): Cartographic and geoinformatics mistakes in urban plans. Geografie 114:179– 191.

  26. Burian, J., Brus, J., Voženílek, V. (2013): Development of Olomouc city in 1930– 2009: based on analysis of functional areas, Journal of Maps, vol. 9, pp. 64-67.

  27. Churchill, R. (2010): Urban cartography and the mapping of Chicago. Geogr Rev 94:1– 22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2004.tb00155.x

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  28. Deeb, R., Ooms, K., Brychtová, A., Van Eetvelde, V., and De Maeyer, P. (2014): Background and foreground interaction: Influence of complementary colors on the searc h task. Color Research & Application, pp. n/a DOI: 10.1002/col.21920

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  29. Dühr, S. (2004): The form, style, and use of cartographic visualizations in European spatial planning: examples from England and Germany. Environ Plan A 36:1961– 1989. DOI: 10.1068/a35262

    View DOICrossrefGoogle ScholarWeb of ScienceScopusOpenCitations

  30. Dühr, S. (2007): The visual language of spatial planning. 224 pp.

  31. Hydrosoft Veleslavín (2005): The minimal standard for digital processing of regional municipality and town plans in GIS. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConfenferences SGEM 2015 www.sgem.org 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences SGEM2015

  32. Hydrosoft Veleslavín (2000): Methodology of a digital processing of a regional municipality plan for GIS in public administration for a district council.

  33. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (2006): Act No. 183/2006 Coll., Construction Act.

  34. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (2006): Ministry Decree No. 500/2006 Coll.

  35. Ministry of Environment of Norway (2001): Reguleringsplan Bebyggelsesplan. 142.

  36. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (1976): Act No. 50/1976 Coll.

  37. Ministry of Regional Development of Czech Republic (1999): Uniform standard of map symbology for a main regional municipality plan and the Regulatory plan.

  38. Monmonier, M. (1996): How to Lie with Maps (2nd Edition), 207 pp.

  39. Pál, S. (2010): Different cartographic visualiz ations of spatial structure in the documents of Hungarian spatial policies. RSA 2010 Annu. Int. Conf. “Regional Responses to Glob. Shifts Actors, Institutions Organ. 15 pp.

  40. Pareta, K. (2012): Urban land use planning using digital cartographic modelling . Urban L Use Plan using Digit Cartographical Model 2:p 356–369.

  41. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny (2002): Rysunek budowlany - Oznaczenia graficzne stosowane w projektach zagospodarowania działki lub terenu. 18 pp.

  42. Sluter, R. (2001): New theoretical research trends in cartography. Rev Bras Cartogr 29–37.

  43. Šťávová, Z. (2008): Inconsistencies cartographic symbolism in the planning document ation. Czech geography in European space, p 1

  44. Tang, X. & Hurni, L. (2009): Regional spatial planning maps: A Sino-Swiss comparison of cartographic visualization methodologies. 24th Int. Cartogr. Conf. - World’s GeoSpatial Solut. 2009. International Cartographic Association, 14 pp.

  45. T-MAPY (2001): Methodology of digital processing of RPD for GIS.

  46. T-MAPY (2004): Integrated approach for digital processing of regional municipality plan for GIS.

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list