SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

DOUBLE MATERIALITY UNDER ESRS: EVIDENCE FROM FIRST-YEAR CSRD DISCLOSURES OF EUROPEAN COMPANIES

Eleonora Stancheva-Todorova

First published: 2026DOI pendingView metrics

Abstract

The introduction of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) represents a major transformation in sustainability reporting in the European Union. A key innovation of the ESRS framework is the concept of double materiality, which requires companies to disclose both the financial implications of sustainability issues and their impacts on society and the environment. This study investigates how European companies operationalize double materiality in the first cycle of CSRD implementation, based on sustainability disclosures for the financial year 2024. Using qualitative content analysis of reports from seven large European companies across different sectors, the study identifies implementation patterns, levels of methodological transparency and key challenges. The study combines qualitative analysis with structured evidence-based assessment to enhance analytical robustness. The findings reveal significant variation in the maturity of double materiality implementation. While some companies demonstrate advanced integration of financial and impact materiality into strategy and risk management, others remain at intermediate or less explicit stages of implementation. Key challenges include limited methodological transparency, insufficient integration of dual perspectives and uneven linkage to strategic decision-making. The study contributes to the literature by providing early empirical evidence on ESRS-aligned reporting practices and offers insights into the evolving implementation of double materiality in the European regulatory context.

Publication details

Title
DOUBLE MATERIALITY UNDER ESRS: EVIDENCE FROM FIRST-YEAR CSRD DISCLOSURES OF EUROPEAN COMPANIES
Authors
Eleonora Stancheva-Todorova
Proceedings
SWS 2026 Conference Preprints
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2026
Pages
Not available yet
ISSN
1314-2704; 1314-2704
ISBN
Not available yet
Language
en
Publication type
Preprint
References9
  1. European Commission. (2025) Corporate sustainability reporting. https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-markets/company-reporting-and-auditing/company-reporting/corporate-sustainability-reporting_en

  2. European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 (ESRS). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj

  3. EFRAG. (2025). State of Play Report 2025. https://insights.efrag.org/reports

  4. Mezzanotte F., Corporate sustainability reporting: double materiality, impacts, and legal risk, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 23(2), 2023, pp. 633-663, DOI: 10.1080/14735970.2024.2319058

  5. Accountancy Europe. (2024). CSRD Readiness: Limited assurance approach to double materiality. https://accountancyeurope.eu/publications/csrd-readiness-limited-assurance-approach-to-double-materiality-assessment/

  6. ESMA. (2025). Guidelines on Enforcement of Sustainability Information (GLESI). https://www.esma.europa.eu/search/site?keys=Guidelines+on+Enforcement+of+Sustainability+Information+%28GLESI%29

  7. Lindgren J. et al., Exploring companies' relationships with environmental indicators from the ESRS: The case of Norway, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 10, 2025, 100320, DOI: 10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100320

  8. Leal Filho W. et al., European sustainability reporting standards: An assessment of requirements and preparedness of EU companies, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 380, 2025, 125008, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125008

  9. Wszelaki, A., & Tkocz-Wolny, K. (2019). Implementation of the provisions of Directive 2014/95/EU on disclosures in the field of corporate social responsibility in the enterprise's accounting practice on the example of a selected listed entity. In 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, Vol. 19, Issue 5.4, pp. 483-492. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/5.4/S23.064

Back to publication list