SWS Academic Research eLibraryEarth & Planetary Sciences

Scholarly record

METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING COMPONENTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF GREEN CONCRETE

Lilita Ābele, Anna Muhina

First published: 2022-12-27https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022v/6.2/s26.56View metrics

Abstract

The construction sector generates more than a quarter of all carbon dioxide emissions, which contributes to the deterioration of the environmental situation in the world. This article describes one of the ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from construction by changing the type of concrete components. In this research, a comparison analysis of various criteria of Portland cement and Ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) was carried out. The main method for solving the problem of this study is the Multicriteria analysis. This tool makes it possible to compare various alternatives, make a rating and determine the best of them. Purpose: a method of reducing carbon dioxide emissions from the construction sector by changing the type of concrete components. Result: determination of the optimal component for concrete production. Target audience: factories for the production of concrete and products from it, contractors, developers. Object of the research: tables for comparing materials. Subject of the research: decarburization of concrete by determining the best component.

Publication Impact Profile

PlumX
  • Captures
  • Mendeley - Readers: 5

Publication details

Title
METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING COMPONENTS IN THE PRODUCTION OF GREEN CONCRETE
Authors
Lilita Ābele, Anna Muhina
Proceedings
SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference- EXPO Proceedings; 22nd SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Proceedings 2022, Nano, Bio, Green and Space - Technologies For a Sustainable Future, VOL 22, ISSUE 6.2
Publisher
STEF92 Technology
Year
2022
Pages
437-444
SWS Citekey
Abele202226437444
ISSN
1314-2704
ISBN
978-619-7603-52-1
Language
en
Publication type
Conference Paper
Proceedings contents
Open official contents
Keywords
References13
  1. Department for Communities and Local Government, Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Communities and Local Government Publications, London. 2009. Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/1132618.pdf

  2. Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). 2020. Fossil CO2 emissions report of all world countries (Latvia). Available at: https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu

  3. International Energy Agency. 2021. Available at: https://www.iea.org/topics/buildings

  4. Jiaying, T.; Xianguo, W. Eco-footprint-based life-cycle eco-efficiency assessment of building projects. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 39, 160�168.Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259996668_Eco-footprint-based_lifecycle_eco-efficiency_assessment_of_building_projects DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.018

  5. Keun-Hyeok Yang, Eun-A Seo, Yeon-Back Jung. Effect of Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag on Life-Cycle Environmental Impact of Concrete. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2014. 26(1). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264180266_Effect_of_Ground_Granulated_Bl ast-Furnace_Slag_on_Life-Cycle_Environmental_Impact_of_Concrete DOI: 10.4334/jkci.2014.26.1.013

  6. Mitch Jacoby. Alternative materials could shrink concrete�s giant carbon footprint. Chemical and engineering news. 2020. Volume 98, Issue 45. Available at: https://cen.acs.org/materials/inorganic-chemistry/Alternative-materials-shrinkconcretes-giant/98/i45 DOI: 10.47287/cen-09845-cover

  7. Muhendislik ve Doga Bilimleri Fakultesi, Insaat Muh. Significance of Concrete Production in Terms of Carbondioxide Emissions: Social and Environmental Impacts. Journal of polytechnic. 2018; 21(2), p. 369-378. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/418238

  8. Pacheco-Torgal, F. Introduction to biopolymers and biotech admixtures for ecoefficient construction materials. In Biopolymers and Biotech Admixtures for EcoEfficient Construction Materials; Wood head Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780081002148/biopolymers-andbiotech-admixtures-for-eco-efficient-construction-materials DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100214-8.00001-4

  9. Peter Seymour. Sustainable Cement. Passive house + sustainable building.2007. Available at: https://passivehouseplus.ie/articles/sustainable-buildingtechnology/sustainable-cement

  10. Roh, S.J.; Tae, S.H.; Shin, S.W.; Woo, J.H. A Study on the Comparison of Characterization of Environmental Impact of Major Building Material for Building Life Cycle Assessment. Archit. Inst. Korea 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287333895_Green_Template_for_Life_Cycle _Assessment_of_Buildings_Based_on_Building_Information_Modeling_Focus_on_Em bodied_Environmental_Impact

  11. Taehyoung, K.; Sungho, T.; Keunhyuk, Y. Development of the Eco-efficiency evaluation method for Concrete. Korea Concrete Institute 2015, 35, 437�438. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305663257_Proposal_for_the_Evaluation_of_ Eco-Efficient_Concrete

  12. Taehyoung, K.; Sungho, T.; Sungjoon, S.; George, F.; Keunhyek, Y. An optimization System for Concrete LifeCycle Cost and Related CO2 Emissions. Sustainability 2016, 8, 361. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/4/361 DOI: 10.3390/su8040361

  13. Worldometer. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/latviaco2-emissions/

View or Download full articleAccess options
Full paper accessChoose SWS login, librarian support, or instant article download.

SWS access login

Login as SWS Scientific Committee

Authors and approved SWS contributors will read and export their own linked papers after identity matching by SWS profile, email and SGEM GlobalID.

For librarian assistance: [email protected]

Purchase Instant Access

48-hour online accessComing soon
Online-only accessComing soon
Download the full article in PDF formatEUR 35
  • Article can be downloaded after successful payment.
  • Article may be used according to SWS library access terms.
  • Article cannot be redistributed.
Get full paper

Back to publication list