Browse

Usually, the methods for noise abatement selected in the action planning for a city are prioritize according with the implementation costs or they are secondary effects of the other measures, which has a totally different scopes. Besides the costs, another effectiveness indicator is used: the number of people benefiting from the noise reduction. The issue of the approach is the fact that this indicator is global and nobody can deduct precisely the location of the persons that benefit of measures. In this way, the ...

Until now, in Romania, approaches to noise and air pollution are strictly different. For example, the noise pollution assessment by mathematical modeling is the approach by law. This is valid both in the preliminary stage of noise mapping and at the final stage of the action plan of noise abatement measures applicable according the Directive 2002/49 /EU [1]. For air quality assessment, a different approach is legislated. In this case, a monitoring -based analysis of indices the specified is carried out and the act...